On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

TechLaw Institute 2019: The Digital Evolution

Released on: Mar. 12, 2019
Running Time: 09:34:00

We are in the midst of a digital evolution. Technology continues to evolve and disrupt at breakneck speed, outpacing existing laws and regulations. As a result, businesses face challenges on all fronts on a daily basis.  Employees working from home and on the road present new and unique challenges for employers. Data breaches are not a matter of if, but when, stealing precious hours of sleep from information and compliance managers and C-suite executives.  Household appliances, devices and vehicles are becoming wirelessly inter-connected, this expanding the ever-increasing ecosystem of “Internet of things.” New technologies are also impacting the way lawyers manage their practices resulting in increased and more complex ethical challenges. Marketing and advertising firms that seek to exploit these new technologies also face challenges and legal risks in navigating these unchartered new waters. 

Courts, clients and colleagues expect lawyers to stay abreast of this evolution – and have the answers they raise.  Clients in particular demand sophisticated counsel that provide insight and value to help them solve their technology-related issues and grow their technology-reliant businesses. 

This year’s TechLaw Institute 2019: The Digital Evolution will provide attendees with the information they need to serve their clients in this ever-changing environment.  Attendees will learn about security issues affecting new technology; legal issues raised by the emerging “Internet of Things”, as well as by disruptive and sharing technologies.  Our speakers will share how companies can exploit all of the marketing possibilities that social media sites offer, while at the same time managing attendant risks.  Hear from industry experts how big data is driving the digital economy, and from regulators who will explain how these initiatives can threaten consumer rights and privacy.  You will hear about the virtual workspace, and how companies are grappling with the security, compliance, and employment issues that come with it.  Experts will also address ethical issues raised by new technology, and how that technology is altering the practice of law.

Lecture Topics [Total time 09:34:00]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:10:06]
    Marc S. Roth, James G. Snell
  • Emerging, Disruptive, and Sharing Technologies [01:01:04]
    John C. Yates, Ilan Hornstein
  • Current Privacy Developments [01:00:20]
    Eric Goldman, James G. Snell
  • The Internet of Things and the Wired Life [01:00:25]
    Anna Hsia, Thomas N. Dahdouh, Laura C. Pirri
  • Emerging Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Overview of Machine Learning Technology [01:00:30]
    Dean W. Harvey
  • The Blockchain Revolution: Beyond Bitcoin [01:01:30]
    Lance Koonce
  • Evolving Legal Ethics: Portable Devices, the Cloud, and Social Media [01:00:20]
    Lucian T. Pera, Kendra L. Basner
  • Cybersecurity, Hacking, and Data Breach [01:16:20]
    Joseph V. DeMarco, Justin Chang, Kristie Chon, Robert S. Leach, Raymond H. Sheen
  • Technology and the Practice of Law [00:59:28]
    Huu Nguyen, Genesis J. Alejandro
  • Reaching Consumers in a Digital World: Marketing, Advertising, and Social Media [01:03:57]
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • A Survey of the Emerging and Disruptive Technologies: Evolving Regulations and Laws (January 1, 2019)
    John C. Yates
  • Assembly Bill No. 375, Chapter 55
  • All I Want for Christmas… Is a New Privacy Law?
    James G. Snell
  • Should You Provide a Short Form Privacy Notice? (November 28, 2018)
    James G. Snell
  • Internet of Things: On the Cusp of a Litigation Explosion
    Christina Lee, James G. Snell
  • Emerging Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Michael Herrera, Dean W. Harvey
  • The Blockchain Revolution: Beyond Bitcoin (January 8, 2018)
    Lance Koonce
  • Use of Artificial Intelligence for Smart Contracts and Blockchains, FinTech Law Report, Vol. 20, Issue 2 (March/April 2018)
    Huu Nguyen, Scott Bailey
  • The Use of Cloud Computing, Mobile Devices and Social Media in the Practice of Law (January 6, 2019)
    Lucian T. Pera
  • Commission Statement and Guidance on Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosures
  • Artificial Intelligence Law Is Here, Part One (July 26, 2018)
    Huu Nguyen
  • Artificial Intelligence Law Is Here, Part Two (August 23, 2018)
    Huu Nguyen
  • Artificial Intelligence Law Is Here, Part Three (October 4, 2018)
    Huu Nguyen
  • Ad HOT BUTTON Checklist
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth
  • Blurred Lines: An Exploration of Consumers’ Advertising Recognition in the Contexts of Search Engines and Native Advertising (December 2017)
  • Promotion BIG TICKET Checklist
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth

Presentation Material

  • Emerging, Disruptive, and Sharing Technologies
    John C. Yates
  • Current Privacy Developments
    Eric Goldman, James G. Snell
  • The Internet of Things and the Wired Life
    Thomas N. Dahdouh, Anna Hsia, Laura C. Pirri, James G. Snell
  • Emerging Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Dean W. Harvey
  • The Blockchain Revolution: Beyond Bitcoin
    Lance Koonce
  • The Blockchain Revolution: Beyond Bitcoin
    Lance Koonce
  • Evolving Legal Ethics: Portable Devices, the Cloud, and Social Media
    Kendra L. Basner, Lucian T. Pera
  • Technology and the Practice of Law
    Genesis J. Alejandro, Huu Nguyen
  • Reaching Consumers in a Digital World: Marketing, Advertising, and Social Media
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth
Co-Chair(s)
Philip Blum ~ Deputy General Counsel, Broadcom Inc.
Marc S. Roth ~ Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
James G. Snell ~ Perkins Coie LLP
Speaker(s)
Tsan Abrahamson ~ Cobalt LLP
Genesis J. Alejandro ~ Nossaman LLP
Kendra L. Basner ~ O'Rielly & Roche LLP
Justin Chang ~ Digital Realty Trust, L.P.
Kristie Chon ~ PayPal Inc
Thomas N. Dahdouh ~ Regional Director, Western Region, Federal Trade Commission
Joseph V. DeMarco ~ DeVore & DeMarco LLP
Eric Goldman ~ Professor of Law and Co-Director, High Tech Law Institute, Santa Clara University School of Law
Dean W. Harvey ~ Perkins Coie LLP
Ilan Hornstein ~ Head of Legal, NAUTO
Anna Hsia ~ ZwillGen LLP
Lance Koonce ~ Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Robert S. Leach ~ Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, N.D. California
Huu Nguyen ~ Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Lucian T. Pera ~ Adams & Reese LLP
Laura C. Pirri ~ Fitbit
Raymond H. Sheen ~ Partner, Hanson Bridgett LLP
John C. Yates ~ Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

TechLaw Institute 2019: The Digital Evolution James G. Snell, Perkins Coie LLP
Philip Blum, Broadcom Inc.
Marc S. Roth, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
 
TechLaw Institute 2018: The Digital Evolution James G. Snell, Perkins Coie LLP
Philip Blum, CA Technologies
Marc S. Roth, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.