On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Internal Investigations 2018

Released on: Jun. 29, 2018
Running Time: 06:23:45
From commencement to conclusion, lawyers face numerous issues when conducting an internal investigation. Allegations by a whistleblower, ethical dilemmas, and managing the costs of an investigation are just some of the challenges that may arise. Companies and their counsel must anticipate potential risks and quickly resolve all issues that arise before, during, and after the investigation.

At this program, an expert faculty will review the fundaments of conducting an effective and efficient investigation using a real-world hypothetical with a graphic novel illustration to bring the story to life.  Leave the program with a better understanding of how to handle investigations successfully for your clients or company.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:23:45]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:02:22]
    Nancy Kestenbaum, Richard J. Morvillo
  • Featured Speaker [00:38:55]
    Steven R. Peikin
  • Commencing the Internal Investigation: Considerations at the Outset [01:38:58]
    Martine M. Beamon, Richard Tarlowe, Joseph G. Petrosinelli
  • Conducting the Internal Investigation [01:31:42]
    Thomas A. Hanusik, Holly H. Weiss, Richard J. Morvillo, Steven L. D'Alessandro, Anne Murray
  • Concluding the Internal Investigation [01:16:20]
    James J. Benjamin, Jr., Arlo Devlin-Brown, John F. Savarese, Elaine H. Mandelbaum
  • Internal Investigations: Regulators Roundtable [01:15:28]
    Nancy Kestenbaum, F. Joseph Warin, Joan Loughnane, Marc P. Berger

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Annual Report: A Look Back at Fiscal Year 2017, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Enforcement
    Richard J. Morvillo
  • Steven R. Peikin, Co-Director, Enforcement Division, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Speech, Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future of the SEC’s Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (November 9, 2017)
    Richard J. Morvillo
  • Stephanie Avakian, Co-Director, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Speech, The SEC Enforcement Division’s Initiatives Regarding Retail Investor Protection and Cybersecurity (October 26, 2017)
    Richard J. Morvillo
  • Emails Between Employees and Their Attorneys Using Company Computers: Are They Still Privileged?, ACC Docket, April 2008
    John K. Villa
  • When and How to Issue Corporate Miranda Warnings, ACC Docket, September 2006
    John K. Villa
  • Can the Feds Interview Corporate Employees Without Your Counsel’s Consent?, ACCA Docket 20, No. 3, March 2002
    John K. Villa
  • What Can You Tell Your Employees When the Feds Arrive to Question Them?, ACCA Docket 20, No. 1, January 2002
    John K. Villa
  • McDermott Will & Emery, Special Report, The General Data Protection Regulation: Key Requirements and Compliance Steps for 2018
    John C. Kocoras
  • Cooperation Credit, Ethical Implications, Privilege and Upjohn Warnings
    Thomas A. Hanusik
  • Mark D. Pollack, Emily L. Seymore, Michael C. Whalen and Nathan Grossman, Conducting Effective Internal Investigations: Practice Pointers and Privilege Considerations
    Mark D. Pollack
  • Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Protections and Implications for Internal Investigations, Policies and Procedures (March 6, 2018)
    Holly H. Weiss
  • Melinda Haag and Rachel Muoio, Cooperate and Risk Waiver? Balancing the Benefits of Government Cooperation with the Risks of Privilege Waiver in Conducting Internal Investigations (April 10, 2018)
    Melinda Haag
  • James J. Benjamin, Jr. and Bianca Figueroa-Santana, Documenting the Findings of an Internal Investigation
    James J. Benjamin
  • Steven M. Malina and Alexandra J. Block, Concluding the Internal Investigation
    Steven M. Malina
  • Paul M.G. Helms and Kristin E. Michaels, SEC Whistleblower Update (March 6, 2018)
    Steven S. Scholes
  • SEC v. Mathias Francisco Sandoval Herrera, et al., Case No. 17-20301-CIV, 2017 WL 6041750 (December 5, 2017)
    Nancy Kestenbaum
  • John F. Savarese and Carol Miller, PLI Internal Investigations 2018
    John F. Savarese

Presentation Material

  • Cast of Characters
  • Internal Investigations 2018 Hypothetical
Chairperson(s)
Nancy Kestenbaum ~ Covington & Burling LLP
Richard J. Morvillo ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Speaker(s)
Martine M. Beamon ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
James J. Benjamin, Jr. ~ Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Marc P. Berger ~ Regional Director, New York Regional Office, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Steven L. D'Alessandro ~ Managing Director, JPMorgan Chase & Co
Arlo Devlin-Brown ~ Covington & Burling LLP
Thomas A. Hanusik ~ Crowell & Moring
Joan Loughnane ~ Chief Counsel to the U.S. Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York
Elaine H. Mandelbaum ~ Managing Director and General Counsel, Litigation and Regulatory Enforcement, Citi Institutional Clients Group
Anne Murray ~ Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Steven R. Peikin ~ Co-Director, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Joseph G. Petrosinelli ~ Williams & Connolly LLP
John F. Savarese ~ Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Richard Tarlowe ~ Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP
F. Joseph Warin ~ Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Holly H. Weiss ~ Schulte Roth & Zabel
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Internal Investigations 2019 (Chicago, IL) Jun. 17, 2019
Internal Investigations 2019 (New York, NY) Jun. 6, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Internal Investigations 2019  
Internal Investigations 2018 Steven S. Scholes, McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Richard J. Morvillo, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Mark D. Pollack, Paul Hastings LLP
Nancy Kestenbaum, Covington & Burling LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.