On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Cloud Computing 2019: Key Issues and Practical Guidance

Released on: May. 6, 2019
Running Time: 06:31:24

Why You Should Attend

This program will provide practical advice on the context and business realities around which cloud computing exists; key terms for cloud computing contracts; vendor and customer obligations and responsibilities associated with cloud computing services; the compliance obligations and concerns most important to potential purchasers; policies and procedures to help protect sensitive data in the cloud; transfers of data between cloud computing vendors; and the unique challenges that cloud presents in litigation. This is an opportunity to hear from professionals representing providers and purchasers alike, who will help you understand the unique attributes of cloud computing deals.

 What You Will Learn

  • How cloud computing technology works and the inherent operational risks
  • How data security may be enhanced, or hampered, by using cloud computing facilities
  • Critical factors to consider with respect to government or other third party access to data in the cloud and how the legal landscape is changing to address those concerns
  • Practical and contractual remedies to help secure corporate assets and intellectual property
  • Your options in contract negotiations with cloud computing vendors, and likely leverage points
  • Navigating international issues, including the GDPR, when deploying cloud solutions

Special Features

  • Earn one hour of Ethics credit
  • Cyberinsurance discussion

Who Should Attend

This program is designed for technology and IP lawyers, in-house counsel and outside counsel, and all lawyers who need to be on the cutting edge of legal changes in IT law. Chief privacy and compliance officers and information security professionals will also find this program valuable.

Program Level: Overview

Intended Audience: All lawyers and allied professionals who need to stay current on the cutting edge of legal issues relating to cloud computing technology.  Business professionals, computer professionals and information managers who need to keep up-to-date with the dramatic changes in this area will also find this program valuable.

Prerequisites: An interest in cutting edge legal issues relating to cloud computing technology.

Advanced Preparation: None 

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:31:24]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:03:25]
    Janine Anthony Bowen, Peter Brown
  • The Business Case for Cloud Computing [01:37:56]
    Janine Anthony Bowen, Scott N. Godes
  • Contract Issues in Cloud Computing Deals [01:17:20]
    Kenneth A. Adler, Manuel Martinez-Herrera
  • Legal Ethics and the Cloud [01:01:35]
    Peter Brown, James Q. Walker
  • Cloud Computing in the Courts: A Consideration of Litigation Issues When The Government Comes Calling [01:00:32]
    Tara Swaminatha, Christopher A. Wiech
  • Privacy Considerations in Cloud Computing [01:30:36]
    Doron S. Goldstein, Noga Rosenthal

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Technology & Business Overview of Cloud Computing
    Janine Anthony Bowen
  • Will Your Company’s Insurance Cover Losses Due to Phishing and Social Engineering Fraud? (July 27, 2018)
    Scott N. Godes
  • Contracting for Cloud Computing: Identifying and Addressing Key Legal and Practical Issues for the Best Outcomes
    Kenneth A. Adler, Manuel Martinez-Herrera
  • Legal Ethics and the Cloud (May 4, 2018)
    James Q. Walker
  • California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA)—SB 178
  • Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act, “CLOUD Act,” S. 2383—115th Congress, February 6, 2018 (March 12, 2019)
  • Janet A. Stiven, Ch. 4: Cloud Computing Agreements, Practising Law Institute, Technology Transactions: A Practical Guide to Drafting and Negotiating Commercial Agreements (February 2018)
  • California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, “CCPA,” Assembly Bill No. 375 (June 28, 2018)
  • SEC Charges Broker-Dealer/Adviser with Inadequate Cybersecurity Procedures (October 11, 2018)
    Doron S. Goldstein
  • The Sky’s the Limit: The Cathay Pacific and British Airways Data Hacks, and the GDPR Six Months On (December 20, 2018)
    Doron S. Goldstein

Presentation Material

  • The Business Case for Cloud Computing
    Janine Anthony Bowen
  • The Business Case for Cloud Computing
    Scott N. Godes
  • Contract Issues in Cloud Computing Deals
    Kenneth A. Adler, Manuel Martinez-Herrera
  • Legal Ethics and the Cloud
    James Q. Walker
  • Legal Ethics Questions
    Peter Brown, James Q. Walker
  • Cloud Computing in the Courts: A Consideration of Litigation Issues When The Government Comes Calling
    Tara Swaminatha, Christopher A. Wiech
  • California State Assembly Committee on Privacy and Consumer Protection Informational Hearing: Understanding the Rights, Protections, and Obligations Established by the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: Where should California go from here?
  • Attorney General Holds Public Forum on CCPA
  • California, Privacy, and the New Normal – CA AB 375 Signed into Law
  • Letter to California Legislature Regarding California Consumer Privacy
  • Privacy Considerations in Cloud Computing
    Doron S. Goldstein, Noga Rosenthal
Co-Chair(s)
Janine Anthony Bowen ~ Baker Hostetler LLP
Peter Brown ~ Peter Brown & Associates PLLC
Speaker(s)
Kenneth A. Adler ~ Loeb & Loeb LLP
Scott N. Godes ~ Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Doron S. Goldstein ~ Partner, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Manuel Martinez-Herrera ~ VP of Legal Affairs, BetterCloud
Noga Rosenthal ~ Chief Privacy Officer and General Counsel, NCC Media
Tara Swaminatha ~ Partner, Squire Patton Boggs
James Q. Walker ~ Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP
Christopher A. Wiech ~ Baker Hostetler LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Cloud Computing 2018: Key Issues and Practical Guidance May. 28, 2018

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Cloud Computing 2019: Key Issues and Practical Guidance Peter Brown, Peter Brown & Associates PLLC
Janine Anthony Bowen, Baker Hostetler LLP
Tanya L. Forsheit, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Marc S. Crandall, Google Inc.
 
Cloud Computing 2018: Key Issues and Practical Guidance Janine Anthony Bowen, Baker Hostetler LLP
Tanya L. Forsheit, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
John P. Hutchins, Baker Hostetler LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.